"There's a good range of Risk and Compliance materials, checklists and outline frameworks in one place. I think that's the difference. Everything's much more searchable, it cuts time and we can find what we really want."
Southampton FC
Access all documents on Group
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business–all whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
UK Benchmarks Regulation—timeline This timeline shows key developments relating to Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 (the UK Benchmarks Regulation) from January 2024 onwards. For earlier developments, see Benchmarks Regulation—timeline [Archived] 2024 Date Source Document Description 22 October 2024 UK Parliament SI 2024/1051: The Critical Benchmarks Regulations 2004 SI 2024/1051: These Regulations are made to specify the WMR Closing Spot Rates (also known as the WMR London 4pm Closing Spot Rate) and ICE Swap Rate® as critical benchmarks for the purposes of Article A20(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds. They are made in exercise of legislative powers under Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 in connection with assimilated law. They are due to come into force on 13 November 2024.See: LNB News 22/10/2024 108 1 October 2024 FCA and BoE FCA press releaseThe end of LIBOR The BoE has issued a joint press release...
EU operational resilience—timeline This timeline shows key developments relating to EU operational resilience requirements for financial services firms from January 2024 onwards. For earlier developments, see Operational resilience—timeline [Archived] 2025 Date Source Document Description 15 April 2025 FSB FSB finalises the common Format for Incident Reporting Exchange (FIRE) The Financial Stability Board (FSB) has published its finalised format for incident reporting exchange (FIRE), which aims to standardise and streamline cyber and operational incident reporting. Developed with private sector collaboration, FIRE addresses fragmentation in reporting requirements across multiple jurisdictions and supports phased implementation. It is interoperable with existing systems and applicable to a wide range of incidents, including those involving third-party service providers. The initiative promotes convergence in cyber incident reporting, reduces the reporting burden for firms, and improves communication among authorities.See: LNB News 15/04/2025 37. 24 March 2025 European Commission COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) …/... supplementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the elements that a financial...
Discover our 222 Checklists on Group
Disclosure—solicitors' obligations This Practice Note identifies solicitors’ obligations in relation to disclosure to their client and the court. It also explains the need to preserve documents, provide the required disclosure and co-operate with the other side particularly in relation to electronic disclosure (e-disclosure). This Practice Note does not cover the provisions of the disclosure scheme operating in the Business and Property Courts. For guidance, see: Disclosure scheme—overview. Obligations Throughout the disclosure process you have obligations to your client, to the court and in accordance with other relevant provisions. These include, but are not limited to: • advising your client of the need to preserve documents—see further: Preservation of documents • ensuring your client complies with all relevant and applicable provisions and makes compliant disclosure—see further: Full disclosure • co-operating with the other side, specifically in relation to e-disclosure and/or where the claim is proceeding on the multi-track and does not involve a claim for personal injury—see further: Co-operating with the other side • a reasonable duty to manage...
GB Energy Labelling Regulation (EU) 2017/1369—snapshot Title Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2017 setting a framework for energy labelling and repealing Directive 2010/30/EU (GB Energy Labelling Regulation) Entry into force 1 August 2017 Subject Energy labelling, energy efficiency of products In GB mandatory energy labelling is regulated by: • Assimilated Regulation (EU) 2017/1369 (the GB Energy Labelling Regulation) • Energy Information Regulations 2011 (EIR 2011) • Ecodesign for Energy-Related Products and Energy Information Regulations 2021, SI 2021/745 In-scope products have to comply with the information and labelling requirements contained therein. The EU Energy Labelling Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2017/1369) continues to apply in Northern Ireland post-Brexit. For more on the position in Northern Ireland, see Practice Note: What does the Northern Ireland Protocol (Windsor Framework) mean for the application of environmental law? DESNZ and the Office for Product Safety and Standards have produced guidance on energy information for suppliers and dealers setting out the different requirements...
Discover our 3705 Practice Notes on Group
Ireland—Deed of assignment and conveyance—unregistered—freehold and leasehold Commencement Section 64(2)(a) of the Land and Conveyancing Law Reform Act 2009 (Ireland) (LCLRA 2009 (IRL)), provides that one of the criteria for establishing if a document is a deed is whether the document is described at its head with the appropriate wording such as ‘Conveyance’, ‘Assignment’, ‘Indenture’, ‘Deed’, etc. Date While it is usual practice to date a deed on the date of completion a deed actually takes effect on the date of its delivery. The concept of delivery means that it is possible for a deed to be valid even if it has not been dated. If a deed is not dated, external evidence is admissible to prove the correct date from which it was intended to operate. Where a date is inserted, it is presumed that this date is the date on which the deed took effect. However, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary. See: Browne v Burton (1847) 17 LJQB 49 (not reported by Lexis+® UK). It is good...
Ireland—data protection impact assessment—artificial intelligence DPIA screening questionnaire The screening questionnaire should be a concise document and not overly burdensome on the business. However, it needs to provide sufficient information to the DPO/Privacy POC to decide if a DPIA needs to be completed. Like the DPIA itself, the screening questionnaire will be drafted by a multidisciplinary team within the business. All completed screening questionnaires should be approved, time stamped and retained by the DPO/Privacy POC. Where a DPIA is required, it should be kept with the screening questionnaire to avoid duplication. The DPIA template is a continuation of the screening questionnaire. While the screening questionnaire and the DPIA detail AI use in accordance with EU GDPR requirements, companies deploying AI systems also need to factor in their obligations under additional relevant legislation, such as the requirement to carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA) under the EU AI Act. While outside the scope of this document, information gathered as part of the screening questionnaire / DPIA exercise will be...
Dive into our 589 Precedents related to Group
If an unincorporated association refuses to disclose its membership, who should be named as the defendant in proceedings where the limitation period is about to expire? An unincorporated association is not a legal entity and so, in theory at least, cannot sue or be sued in its own name. This was the position set out in London Association for Protection of Trade v Greenlands Limited. The legal position was considered in some detail in Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v Broughton. This case involved a campaign by the Animal Liberation Front and associated organisations. The normal way forward would be to obtain a representation order whereby a named member or members or officers of the association would be made parties ‘on behalf of the members of the association’. However, it may not be possible to seek and obtain such a representation order before the limitation period expires and therefore, the potential claimant may wish to know whether it can join...
When must an order be served on a respondent following a without notice application? In many cases the court will serve the order. Where the applicant is to serve, the precise requirements for serving the order are likely to vary according to the terms of the order granted and any undertakings given by the applicant. In most cases, the order itself will stipulate when it is required to be served by the applicant. There is no specific guidance in the CPR, practice directions, authorities or Court Guides providing a deadline as to when an order made subsequent to a without notice application must be served with the exception of the following: • if dealing with proceedings in the Chancery Division, a court practice note sets out the procedure to be applied but does not stipulate any specific time limits. However, it does state that if the order is picked up from a collection tray at court then the law firm has a responsibility to make sure...
See the 829 Q&As about Group
Law360, London: A Russian subsidiary of fertilizer producer EuroChem convinced a court on 13 June 2025 to compel industrial group Tecnimont to produce its communications with the Italian sanctions authority, days after the trial over the €212m bond dispute kicked off.
Arbitration analysis: The 2025 Arbitration Rules of the Lima Chamber of Commerce (CCL) introduce several reforms aimed at aligning with international arbitration standards, including the scrutiny of awards, revised rules for arbitrator appointments in multi-party cases and mandatory procedural calendars with fixed dates. While these changes represent a move toward greater efficiency and quality control, the work is still in progress. Although these reforms are well-intentioned, their effectiveness will depend on how they are implemented in practice. Without further clarification through practical guidelines or supplementary rules, there is a risk that some provisions (particularly the scrutiny mechanism) will remain underutilised or inconsistently applied. Written by Alfredo Bullard Gonzalez and Uber López Montreuil.
Read the latest 2465 News articles on Group
**Trials are provided to all ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234