Construction analysis: In this Part 8 claim, the Technology and Construction C ourt (TCC) held that, while informal, the parties had entered a concluded contract by an exchange of WhatsApp messages. The essential terms had been agreed and other terms were not essential or would be implied. The court further held that three out of four invoices issued by the defendant were valid applications for payment, even where two of the invoices did not contain a mathematical breakdown of the sum due. In their context, the invoices were sufficiently clear and intended to be payment applications. Written by James Frampton, barrister at Keating Chambers, and Liam Hendry, senior associate at Archor LLP.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Duty to warnThis Practice Note examines the extent to which contractors, sub-contractors and consultants have a duty to warn their employer of inadequacies that they discover in designs that have been produced, or works that have been carried out, by others.If a contractor or a sub-contractor
Good faith in construction contractsThis Practice Note considers if and when a duty of good faith may be implied into a construction contract, and also looks at some of the standard form construction contracts which contain express obligations to act in good faith, including their effect on the
How can a party recover for damage caused to its property by construction works undertaken on a neighbouring property by a subcontractor, and should the claim be brought against the neighbour, the main contractor or the subcontractor?Liability in tort may arise in a number of different ways in
A sub-contractor carrying out piling works damaged underground utilities at the site. The main contractor thought it had located the utilities before starting the works, but had not. The employer commenced proceedings against the contractor, but has since learned of the sub-contractor’s involvement.
0330 161 1234