Property Disputes analysis: In a wide-ranging and interesting review of various creative arguments seeking to establish grounds for opposing the renewal of a subsisting code agreement under paragraphs 31(4) (a), (c) and (d) of the Electronic Communications Code (‘Code’), the Upper Tribunal (‘UT’) held that the grounds were not proven. This update focuses on grounds 31(4) (c) and (d), namely having an intention to redevelop, and the paragraph 21 public benefit test. Written by David Jones and Mark Barley, associate and partner at Womble Bond Dickinson.
To continue reading this news article, as well as thousands of others like it, sign in with ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø or register for a free trial
EXISTING USER? SIGN IN CONTINUE READING GET A QUOTE
To read the full news article, register for a free Lexis+ trial
**Trials are provided to all ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these ÑÇÖÞÉ«ÇéÍø services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
* denotes a required field
Telecoms leases—the previous Electronic Communications Code—drafting points and due diligence [Archived]ARCHIVED: This archived Practice Note is drafted in the context of the previous/old Electronic Communications Code (the previous Code) (and highlights drafting points and due diligence where a
Micklefield clausesWhat is a Micklefield clause?It is common for employee share plans to provide that, on termination of employment (or when an employee is given or receives notice of termination of employment), subsisting share awards will be forfeited and subsisting share options will lapse.It is
What is the difference between an appeal and a review?What is an appeal?An appeal in insolvency proceedings is no different to an appeal in normal litigation. An appeal will be allowed only if the appeal court is satisfied that the decision of the lower court was 'wrong' or 'unjust because of a
Financial clean break orders in family proceedingsDuty of the court to consider a clean breakAlthough there is no presumption in favour of there being a financial clean break between parties on divorce, the court is under a duty to consider whether it would be appropriate to exercise its powers so
0330 161 1234