"We couldn't do as good a job as we do without it. 亚洲色情网 gives us the security and confidence that we are best serving our clients because the information we are working on is the most accurate we can get"
Avensure
Access all documents on London borough
A single-tier council responsible for the delivery of all services for a defined area within Greater London, established by the London Government Act 1963.
A London borough is both a principal area and a local government area for the purposes of the Local Government Act 1972 and the Local Government Act 1992. The 32 London boroughs with the City of London, the Inner Temple and the Middle Temple together constitute the Greater London administrative area.
Speed up all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you to work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business鈥揳ll whilst saving time and reducing risk.
For our full legal glossary and more legal research sources, register for a free Lexis+ trial
A summary checklist and timeline for the presentation, service and advertisement of a winding-up petition to the court by a creditor of a company registered in England or Wales The Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020 contained provisions which, on a temporary basis, imposed significant limitations on the ability for a creditor to seek a winding-up order against a company. For the position pre-1 October 2021, see Practice Note: Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020鈥攖emporary changes to corporate statutory demands and winding-up petitions [Archived]. For the position from 1 October 2021 to 31 March 2022 (including an increase in the amount required for a petition debt and the need for a creditor to give 21 days鈥 notice of its intention to present a winding-up petition), see Practice Note: Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2022鈥攚inding-up petitions from 1 October 2021 to 31 March 2022 [Archived]. Step/action Time (days) Section/rule Serve statutory demand Draft statutory demand which must contain the information set out in rule 7.3 of the Insolvency...
Checklist for appeals and reviews in insolvency proceedings Reviews A review in insolvency proceedings is where the court revisits and reviews an order already made by it. The review process (in both corporate and personal insolvency) allows a decision to be reviewed either by the judge that made it (see Official Receiver v Bathurst) or by another judge (see Re W & A Glaser Limited). Both the personal and corporate insolvency courts have the power to review, rescind or vary their own orders (section 375 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986) and Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016), SI 2016/1024, r 12.59(1)). Reviews must not be seen as an alternative route to appeal a decision and the court will exercise its discretion to review an order carefully. For further information, see Practice Note: Reviews of insolvency orders. General The table below deals with reviews of any order, other than a winding-up or bankruptcy order, made by the insolvency court. Step/action Time Authority 1....
Discover our 5 Checklists on London borough
Council members for a principal area are elected by the local government electors for that area. Every non-metropolitan county is divided into electoral divisions, and every metropolitan and non-metropolitan district is divided into wards, each returning a specified number of councillors. The electoral arrangements for each principal council are reviewed from time to time or upon request.There must be a separate election for each electoral division or ward.Members serve a four-year term.Local authorities have three options for the frequency of elections:鈥hole council elections: members hold office for four years; the elections are held every fourth year; all the members are elected in each year in which the elections are held, and they all retire together鈥lections by halves: members hold office for four years; the elections are held every two years; one-half are elected in each year in which the elections are held, and one-half retire in each election year鈥lections by thirds: members hold office for four years; the elections are held in every three out of those four years; one-third...
Relief from sanctions鈥攎aking or opposing an application This Practice Note gives practical guidance on how to make or oppose (or defend) an application for relief from sanctions (RFS) under CPR 3.9. In particular, it covers the evidence in support of an application for relief, the evidence in response to a relief from sanctions application, costs issues in relief applications and how to appeal a decision granting or refusing relief. Throughout it offers general practical tips on applying for relief from sanctions. This Practice Note should be read in conjunction with Practice Notes: 鈥 How to make an application for a court order (CPR 23) 鈥 Relief from sanctions鈥攚hen is an application for relief required? 鈥 Case management鈥攃ompliance 鈥 Relief from sanctions鈥攖he courts鈥 approach 鈥 Relief from sanctions鈥攊llustrative decisions (from 1 January 2024); and 鈥 Interim applications鈥攃osts recovery See also Precedents: 鈥 Letter requesting consent to application for relief from sanctions 鈥 Letter responding to request for consent to relief from sanctions 鈥 Draft order for relief from sanctions...
Discover our 247 Practice Notes on London borough
TCPA 1990, s 252 order (London) TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 THE EXTINGUISHMENT OF VEHICULAR RIGHTS ON HIGHWAY [insert highway description and number] ORDER [insert number] The Council of the London Borough of [insert name of borough] (The Council) makes this Order in exercise of the powers under section 249 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (鈥榯he Act鈥). 1 The Council hereby authorises the extinguishment of vehicular rights on the highway described in, and shown on the plan, in [Schedule 1] to this Order in accordance with a proposal by resolution under reference [insert reference number of resolution] adopted by [insert name of local planning authority] for improving the amenity of the area that includes the public ceasing to have a right of way with vehicles over the said highway. 2 [Notwithstanding the provision for extinguishment of vehicular rights contained in Clause 1 above, the following vehicles may have access to the pedestrian area, namely [insert (a) vehicles complying with a particular description,...
TCPA 1990, s 252 Notice pursuant to a draft order under TCPA 1990, s 249 London Borough of [insert name of Borough], Town and Country Planning Act 1990 The Council of the London Borough of [insert name of Council] gives notice of the proposal to make an Order under Town and Country Planning act 1990, s 249 (TCPA 1990) to authorise the extinguishment of vehicular rights on [insert description of highway where vehicular rights are to be extinguished], more particularly described in and shown on the plan in Schedule 1 below. The proposed order is made in accordance with a proposal by resolution under reference [insert reference number of resolution] adopted by [insert name of local planning authority] for improving the amenity of the area, which includes the public ceasing to have a right of way with vehicles over the said highway. [The order would also authorise the creation of a new highway described in and shown on the plan in Schedule 2. OR The order would also authorise...
Dive into our 2 Precedents related to London borough
An adjudicator has the power to 鈥榯ake the initiative in ascertaining the facts and the law鈥. What does this mean, and are there any limits on the power? In terms of section 108(2)(f) of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996), parties to construction contracts must provide for the adjudicator to have the power to take the initiative in ascertaining the facts and the law. If they do not, the parties鈥 adjudication rules are replaced with those in the Scheme for Construction Contracts (the Scheme), which does include this provision. The power to take the initiative gives the adjudicator the discretion to take a 鈥榩roactive鈥 approach. This is different from the position of a judge, whose role is generally one of a 鈥榬eferee鈥. In Macob v Morrison the court explained that the adjudicator could, on the basis of this power, 鈥榗onduct an entirely inquisitorial process, or鈥nvite representations from the parties鈥. It said that Parliament, in drafting HGCRA 1996, envisioned that adjudications would not...
Can you direct me to case law Precedents on psychological injury caused by a delay in diagnosis? Delay in diagnosis Delayed diagnosis cases more frequently become contentious because of causation issues. Almost all clinical negligence claimants will (obviously) come to their clinician with major risks to their health already in place. Establishing whether, and precisely what, additional loss and damage has been caused because of medical negligence is the issue at the heart of this area of practice. For further information on the common issues which arise in claims relying on an allegation that a diagnosis has been negligently delayed, see the Practice Note: Delay in medical treatment. Loss of life expectation and physical or psychological distress due to delayed diagnosis can be difficult to quantify. For further information, see Commentary: Diagnosis: Clinical Negligence [21.14]. Case law The following cases may be of assistance, but each case will depend on its individual facts. A duty to avoid the risk of psychiatric illness may arise where psychiatric injury...
See the 200 Q&As about London borough
This week's edition of Public Law weekly highlights includes: Lord Reed delivers a significant 鈥榠nstitutionalist鈥 speech on trust in the courts in a populist age, and UK-EU political agreement on Gibraltar establishing a customs union between the EU and Gibraltar, alongside criticism of the treaty scrutiny process in Parliament, with Dame Emily Thornberry calling it 鈥渞ubbish鈥 during a Commons debate. Also in this edition, a major speech from Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood about the ECHR. Case law updates include the Administrative Court鈥檚 dismissal of judicial review claims against VAT on private school fees, finding the Finance Act 2025 changes justified in human rights law terms, and the High Court鈥檚 rejection of an injunction sought against protestors who opposed the EHRC鈥檚 stance following the Supreme Court鈥檚 ruling in For Women Scotland Ltd v Scottish Ministers, with the court finding no imminent risk of trespass. This edition features further updates on Brexit highlights, Brexit SIs, Post-Brexit guidance, Constitutional and administrative law, Judicial review, Equality and human rights, State security and intelligence, Information...
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Divisional Court has ruled on the consequences of misusing artificial intelligence (AI) in court proceedings. Following two referrals arising from actual or suspected misuse of generative AI by lawyers, the court used its inherent powers to enforce the duties owed by lawyers to the court (the Hamid jurisdiction). The judgment provides vitally important guidance to practitioners on their duties to the court and to their professional regulators when using AI. It also explains the sanctions likely to apply for misuse of AI including public admonishment, strike out and costs sanctions, referrals to regulators, contempt of court and, in the most egregious cases, referral to the police for criminal investigation. The judgment also provides a comprehensive index of cases from around the world where fake citations (or other misleading material) have been placed before the court. Written by Harriet Campbell, senior knowledge lawyer at Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP.
Read the latest 95 News articles on London borough
**Trials are provided to all 亚洲色情网 content, excluding Practice Compliance, Practice Management and Risk and Compliance, subscription packages are tailored to your specific needs. To discuss trialling these 亚洲色情网 services please email customer service via our online form. Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK, Ireland and selected UK overseas territories and Caribbean countries. We may terminate this trial at any time or decide not to give a trial, for any reason. Trial includes one question to LexisAsk during the length of the trial.
0330 161 1234