Construction industry scheme

The construction industry scheme (CIS) was devised to limit the amount of tax lost as a result of sub-contractors in the construction industry under-declaring or failing to notify their chargeability to UK tax.

The scheme operates to withhold tax at source at the point of making a contract payment (ie a payment made by a contractor under a construction contract), thereby reducing the risk of a subsequent default by the sub-contractor. However broadly speaking, if the sub-contractor can, among other matters, prove it has complied with its tax obligations it can apply to receive payments gross.

The scheme was overhauled in 2006 and an improved regime came into effect on 6 April 2007.

For more information, see Practice Note: The construction industry scheme—when does it apply?

Key definitions

Because the CIS rules apply solely to contractors and sub-contractors (or, where relevant, their nominees) providing or operating under a contract for the provision of construction operations (ie a construction contract), it is important to understand the meaning of each of these defined terms. These key definitions are outlined below and also covered in more detail in Practice Note:

To view the latest version of this document and thousands of others like it, sign-in with ��ɫ�� or register for a free trial.

TAKE A FREE TRIAL

Latest Tax News

Tax weekly highlights—8 May 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) analysis of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Beard on whether distributions by a company from its share premium account under Jersey law were dividends of a capital nature for UK income tax purposes; (2) analysis of the decision of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) in Roseline Logistics on whether a customs agent could be made secondarily liable for unpaid import VAT; (3) updates to HMRC’s Check Employment Status for Tax (CEST) tool; (4) HMRC’s new online tool for guidance on compliance checks; (5) Spotlight 70 on VAT grouping structure arrangements used by care providers; (6) a roundup of recent cases and HMRC manual updates.

FTT decides that customs agent was secondarily liable for unpaid import VAT (Roseline Logistics Ltd v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Roseline Logistics Ltd v HMRC (15 April 2025), the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) dismissed an appeal against a post clearance demand note in respect of the improper use of postponed import VAT accounting by a logistics firm.

Court of Appeal finds that distributions debited to company’s share premium account were dividends that were not capital in nature (Beard v HMRC)

Tax analysis: In Beard v HMRC (2 May 2025), the Court of Appeal upheld decisions of the First-tier Tax Tribunal (FTT) and Upper Tribunal (UT) that distributions the taxpayer received from an overseas company, which were debited from the company’s share premium account, were dividends that were not capital in nature and were therefore chargeable to income tax.

Tax weekly highlights—1 May 2025

This week's edition of Tax weekly highlights includes: (1) coverage of the numerous ‘Tax update spring 2025’ announcements and publications, (2) an update from the CIOT on the LLP salaried member rules and (3) News Analyses on the Upper Tribunal’s (UT) decision on an SDLT overpayment relief claim (L-L-O Contracting Ltd) and on the First-tier Tax Tribunal’s (FTT) decisions on (i) the remedy available under FA 2003, Sch 10, para 34 when no other SDLT relief is available (Candy), (ii) the effect of liquidation on a director loan (Quillan) and (iii) a legislative drafting error in respect of the temporary reduced rate of VAT (JD Wetherspoon).

��ɫ��